Implement weight management systems, methods, and apparatus

ABSTRACT

Systems, methods and apparatus are provided for managing implement weight. In some embodiments, a position sensor is used to determine a position of the wing section and a downforce applied to the wing is modified in order to lower the wing section. In some embodiments, the position sensor indicates the position of a wing wheel assembly of the wing section. In other embodiments, the position sensor indicates the position of a center wheel assembly of a center section of the implement.

BACKGROUND

In recent years, agronomic studies have increased interest in ensuringproper weight management on agricultural implements, particularly duringthe planting pass. Transferring weight between components of a largeimplement entails safety hazards and risk of damaging the implement ortractor.

Thus there is a need in the art for improved systems, methods andapparatus for implement weight management. There is a particular need inthe art for such systems, methods and apparatus offering improved safetyduring operation.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a side elevation view of a tractor drawing an embodiment of aplanter.

FIG. 2 is a side elevation view of a row unit of the planter of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a rear perspective view of the planter of FIG. 1 with the rowunits not shown for illustrative purposes.

FIG. 4 is a rear perspective view of a center wheel assembly of theplanter of FIG. 1.

FIG. 5 is a rear perspective view of a wing wheel assembly of theplanter of FIG. 1.

FIG. 6 schematically illustrates an embodiment of a weight transfercontrol system.

FIG. 7A is a side elevation view of an embodiment of a wing positionsensor.

FIG. 7B is a side elevation view of the wing position sensor of FIG. 7Ain another position.

FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of a weight transfer process.

FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of a weight transfer shutoff process.

FIG. 10A is a side elevation view of an embodiment of a center wheelposition sensor.

FIG. 10B is a side elevation view of the center wheel position sensor ofFIG. 10A in a second position.

FIG. 11 illustrates another embodiment of a weight transfer shutoffprocess.

FIG. 12 illustrates another embodiment of a weight transfer process.

FIG. 13 illustrates an embodiment of a spring force entry screen.

FIG. 14 illustrates an embodiment of a weight transfer systemcalibration process

DESCRIPTION Implement Embodiments

Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designateidentical or corresponding parts throughout the several views, FIG. 1illustrates a planter 300 being drawn by a tractor 5. The planter 300includes a transversely extending toolbar to which multiple row units200 are mounted in transversely spaced relation.

Referring to FIG. 3, the planter 300 is coupled to the tractor 5 by ahitch assembly 350 and thereby drawn in the planting direction indicatedby arrow F. The hitch assembly 350 is coupled to a weight transferassembly 340. The weight transfer assembly 340 preferably includes ahitch actuator 345; the hitch actuator 345 preferably comprises adual-acting hydraulic cylinder and is preferably disposed to transfer avertical load from the tractor to the planter or from the planter to thetractor.

The transversely extending toolbar of the planter 300 preferablyincludes a left wing section 310-1, a center section 330, and a rightwing section 310-2. A plurality of row units 200 (not shown in FIG. 3)are preferably mounted to each section of the toolbar. The left wingsection 310-1 is preferably pivotally coupled to the center section 330(either directly or via intermediate structure) for relative motionabout a substantially horizontal axis parallel to the plantingdirection. A left wing flex actuator 312-1 (preferably a dual-actinghydraulic cylinder) is preferably pivotally coupled to the left wingsection 310-1 and the center section 330. The wing flex actuator 312-1is preferably configured to transfer a vertical load between the leftwing section 310-1 and the center section 330. The right wing section310-2 is preferably pivotally coupled to the center section 330 (eitherdirectly or via intermediate structure) for relative motion about asubstantially horizontal axis parallel to the planting direction. Aright wing flex actuator 312-2 (preferably a dual-acting hydrauliccylinder) is preferably pivotally coupled to the right wing section310-2 and the center section 330. The wing flex actuator 312-2 ispreferably configured to transfer a vertical load between the right wingsection 310-2 and the center section 330.

In some embodiments the planter 300 comprises one of the embodimentsdisclosed in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/040756 orInternational Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/023287 (“the '287Application”), both of which are hereby incorporated by referenceherein.

Each wing section 310 preferably includes a wing wheel assembly 500mounted to a distal and thereof. Each wing wheel assembly 500 ispreferably configured to rollingly support the wing section 310 as theplanter 300 traverses the field. Referring to FIG. 5, the wing wheelassembly 500 preferably includes a mounting bar 522 mounted to the wingsection 310 above and behind a distal end of the wing section. A wingwheel frame 540 is pivotally mounted to the wing section 310 by one ormore transversely extending pins 535. A wing wheel 550 is rollinglymounted to a rearward end of the wing wheel frame 540. An actuator 510is pivotally mounted at a first end to the mounting bar 522 andpivotally mounted at a second end to wing wheel frame 540 for raisingand lowering of the wing section 310. The actuator 510 is preferably adual- acting hydraulic cylinder.

The center section 330 preferably includes a plurality of center wheelassemblies 400. Each center wheel assembly 400 is preferably configuredto rollingly support the center section 330 as the planter 300 traversesthe field. Referring to FIG. 4, the wing wheel assembly 400 preferablyincludes a mounting bar 422 mounted to the center section 330 andpositioned above the center section. A center wheel frame 430 ispivotally mounted to the center bar 330 by a transversely extending pin425. A center wheel actuator 410 is pivotally mounted at a first end tothe mounting bar 422 and pivotally mounted at a second end to the centerwheel frame 430 for selective raising and lowering of the toolbar. Awheel frame 440 is pivotally mounted to the center wheel frame 430 abouta transverse pin 435. A forward wheel 450 is rollingly mounted to aforward end of the wheel frame 440. A rear wheel 460 is rollinglymounted to a rearward end of the wheel frame 440. In operation, thecenter wheel assembly 400 rollingly supports the weight of the toolbarand the wheel frame 440 pivots to allow the forward and rear wheels 450,460 to move up and down relative to one another as the center wheelassembly encounters obstructions or uneven terrain.

Turning to FIG. 2, one of the row units 200 of the planter 300 isillustrated in more detail. A parallel linkage 216 supports the row unit200 from the one of the toolbar sections 310, permitting each row unitto move vertically independently of the toolbar and the other spaced rowunits in order to accommodate changes in terrain or upon the row unitencountering a rock or other obstruction as the planter is drawn throughthe field. Each row unit 200 further includes a mounting bracket 220 towhich is mounted a hopper support beam 222 and a subframe 224. Thehopper support beam 222 preferably supports a seed hopper 226 and afertilizer hopper 228. The row unit 200 preferably includes seed meter230 disposed to receive and meter seeds from the seed hopper 226 into aseed tube 232 (or seed conveyor) disposed to guide seeds from the seedmeter to the soil. The subframe 224 preferably operably supports afurrow opening assembly 234 and a furrow closing assembly 236.

Each row unit 200 preferably includes a downforce actuator 280(preferably a dual-acting hydraulic actuator) disposed to transmitvertical loads between the toolbar section 310 and the row unit 200. Thedownforce actuator 280 preferably comprises one of the downforceactuator embodiments disclosed in International Patent Application No.PCT/US2012/049747 (“the '747 Application”), incorporated herein byreference. The downforce actuator 280 is preferably pivotally mounted atan upper pivot point to a mounting bracket 214; the mounting bracket 214is preferably rigidly mounted to the toolbar section 310. The downforceactuator 280 is preferably pivotally mounted at a lower end to theparallel linkage 216.

The furrow opening assembly 234 preferably includes a pair of furrowopening disk blades 244 and a pair of gauge wheels 248 selectivelyvertically adjustable relative to the disk blades 244 by a depthadjusting mechanism 268. The disk blades 244 are rotatably supported ona shank 254 depending from the subframe 224. Gauge wheel arms 260pivotally support the gauge wheels 248 from the subframe 224. The gaugewheels 248 are rotatably mounted to the forwardly extending gauge wheelarms 260.

In operation of the row unit 200, the furrow opening assembly 234 cuts afurrow 38 into the soil surface 40 as the planter 300 is drawn throughthe field. The seed hopper 226, which holds the seeds to be planted,communicates a constant supply of seeds 42 to the seed meter 230. Theseed 42 drops from the end of the seed tube 232 into the furrow 38 andthe seeds 42 are covered with soil by the closing wheel assembly 236.

Control System Embodiments

Turning to FIG. 6, a control system 600 for controlling downforce (i.e.,weight transfer) functions in the planter 300 is illustratedschematically.

In the control system 600, a pressure source P (e.g., a tractorhydraulic pressure outlet) is preferably in fluid communication witheach of the valves described below. A shut-off valve 690 (preferably anelectro-hydraulic on-off valve) is preferably in series fluidcommunication with both the pressure source P and all or a subset of thevalves described below in order to selectively stop fluid flow andpressure supply to the valves.

The control system 600 preferably includes a monitor 610 having acentral processing unit (“CPU”), a memory, and a graphical userinterface (“GUI”) allowing the user to view and enter data into themonitor. The monitor 610 is preferably configured to perform the samefunctions as the planter monitor embodiments disclosed in Applicant'sU.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/292,384, the disclosure of which ishereby incorporated herein in its entirety by reference, such that themonitor is capable of displaying downforce and seeding information tothe user. The monitor 610 is preferably mounted in a cab 7 of thetractor 5 (see FIG. 1) for viewing and use by the operator. In someembodiments, the monitor 610 may additionally encompass a CPU and memorystored outside the tractor cab (e.g., on the planter 300).

The monitor 610 is preferably in data communication with a plurality ofrow unit downforce valves 680, enabling the monitor 610 to send apressure command signal to each row unit downforce valve. The row unitdownforce valves 680 are preferably electro-hydraulic pressure controlvalves (e.g., pressure reducing/relieving valves) configured to controlan outlet pressure in “pressure control”, e.g., to maintain a selectedcontrol pressure at an outlet of the valve. A row unit downforce valve680 is preferably in fluid communication with one chamber of each rowunit downforce actuator 680. In some embodiments a row unit downforcevalve 680 is in fluid communication with the counter-acting chamber ofall or a subset of counter-acting chambers as disclosed in the '747Application, previously incorporated by reference. The row unitdownforce valves are thus enabled to cause each row unit downforceactuator to impose a selected net force (e.g., down force or lift force)on the row unit 200 associated with the row unit downforce actuator.

The monitor 610 is preferably in data communication with left wing flexvalve 612-1 and right wing flex valves 612-2, enabling the monitor tosend a pressure command signal to each wing flex valve. The wing flexvalves 612 are preferably electro-hydraulic pressure reducing/relievingvalves configured to control an outlet pressure in “pressure control”,e.g., to maintain a selected control pressure at an outlet of the valve.A first left wing flex valve 612-1 is preferably in fluid communicationwith a first chamber of the left wing flex actuator 312-1. A second leftwing flex valve 612-1 is preferably in fluid communication with asecond, counter-acting chamber of the left wing flex actuator 312-1. Afirst right wing flex valve 612-2 is preferably in fluid communicationwith a first chamber of the right wing flex actuator 312-2. A secondright wing flex valve 612-2 is preferably in fluid communication with asecond, counter-acting chamber of the right wing flex actuator 312-2.Each pair of wing flex valves 612 is thus enabled to cause theassociated wing flex actuator 312 to impose a selected net force (e.g.,down force or lift force) on the wing section 130 associated with thepair of wing flex valves.

The monitor 610 is preferably in data communication with first andsecond hitch flex valves 645. The hitch valves 645 are preferablyelectro-hydraulic pressure control valves (e.g., pressurereducing/relieving valves) configured to control an outlet pressure in“pressure control”, e.g., to maintain a selected control pressure at anoutlet of the valve. The first hitch valve 645 is preferably in fluidcommunication with a first chamber of the hitch actuator 345. A secondhitch valve 645 is preferably in fluid communication with a second,counter-acting chamber of the hitch actuator. The hitch valves 645 arethus enabled to cause the hitch actuator 345 to impose a selected netforce (e.g., down force or lift force) on the toolbar of the planter300.

The monitor 610 is preferably in data communication with a left wingposition sensor 620-1 associated with the left wing section 310-1 and aright wing position sensor 620-2 associated with the right wing section310-2. Each wing position sensor 620 is preferably configured togenerate a signal related to a position of the associated wing section.Specifically, each wing position sensor 620 preferably generates asignal which increases or decreases as the associated wing section risesrelative to the ground surface in contact with the wing wheel 550.

Referring to the embodiment of FIGS. 7A and 7B, each wing positionsensor 620 preferably comprises a Hall-effect sensor configured togenerate a signal related to its distance from a magnet 516. In theillustrated embodiment, the wing position sensor 620 is mounted to atang 524, the tang being rigidly mounted to the mounting bar 522. Avertical slot 526 in the tang 524 slidingly engages a pin 514. The pin514 is mounted to a clevis 512, the clevis being mounted to an upper endof the actuator 510 of the wing wheel assembly 500. The magnet 516 ismounted to the pin 514. As best illustrated with reference to FIG. 7Aand FIG. 5, when the wing section 310 is fully lowered, the pin 514 isin contact with an upper end of the slot 526 such that the magnet 514 isadjacent to the sensor 620, causing the sensor 620 to generate a “winglowered” signal. When the wing section 310 rises relative to the wingwheel assembly 500 (e.g., when the right wing section 310 rotates upwardwith respect to the center section 330) as illustrated in FIG. 7B, thepin 516 slides downward within the slot 526 and away from the sensor620, thus causing the sensor 620 to generate a “wing raised” signaldistinguishable from the “wing lowered” signal.

Returning to FIG. 6, the monitor 610 is preferably in data communicationwith a left center wheel position sensor 630-1 associated with the leftcenter wheel assembly 400-1 and a right center wheel position sensor630-2 associated with the right center wheel assembly 400-2. Each centerwheel position sensor 630 is preferably configured to generate a signalrelated to a position of the associated center wheel assembly and thusof the center section 330. Specifically, each center wheel positionsensor 630 preferably generates a signal which increases as theassociated center wheel assembly lowers relative to the center section330 (e.g., as the center section 330 rises relative to the groundsurface).

Referring to the embodiment of FIGS. 10A and 10B, each center wheelposition sensor 630 preferably comprises a Hall-effect sensor configuredto generate a signal related to its distance from a magnet 416. In theillustrated embodiment, the center wheel position sensor 630 is mountedto a tang 424, the tang being rigidly mounted to the mounting bar 422. Avertical slot 426 in the tang 424 slidingly engages a pin 414. The pin414 is mounted to a clevis 412, the clevis being mounted to an upper endof the actuator 410 of the center wheel assembly 400. The magnet 416 ismounted to the pin 414. As best illustrated with reference to FIG. 10Aand FIG. 4, when the center section 330 is fully lowered, the pin 414 isin contact with an upper end of the slot 426 such that the magnet 414 isadjacent to the sensor 630, causing the sensor 630 to generate a first“center lowered” signal. When the center section 330 rises relative tothe center wheel assembly 400 as illustrated in FIG. 10B, the pin 416slides downward within the slot 426 and away from the sensor 630, thuscausing the sensor 630 to generate a second signal distinguishable fromthe “center lowered” signal.

In operation of the control system 600, the pressure source P suppliespressure to each of the actuators via the associated valves. The monitor610 is preferably in data communication with the shut-off valve 690 suchthat the monitor may send command signals causing the shut- off valve toclose or open. In the illustrated embodiment, closing the shut-off valve690 cuts off fluid flow to only a subset of the valves, specifically thewing flex valves and the hitch valve. Thus in the illustrated embodimentthe monitor 610 is enabled to cut off pressure supply to the hitch 612valves and the wing flex valves 612 without cutting off pressure to therow unit downforce valves 680. In other embodiments, first and secondshut-off valves (preferably in data communication with the monitor 610)may be placed in series fluid communication with the wing flex valvesand the hitch valves to enable individually selective deactivation ofthe wing flex valves or the hitch valves.

Weight Transfer Methods

The monitor 610 is preferably configured to perform a wing flex weighttransfer process 800 illustrated in FIG. 8. The process 800 generallycontrols the pressure in one of the wing flex actuators 312 based inpart on the downforce applied by downforce actuators 280 to the rowunits 200 on the toolbar section 310 associated with the wing flexactuator. At step 805 the operator preferably draws the planter 300across a field in the working configuration illustrated in FIG. 3. Atstep 810, the monitor 610 preferably determines the downforce applied ateach row unit 200. In a preferred embodiment, step 810 is accomplishedby determining the net pressure P_(R) being commanded by the monitor 610to each row unit downforce actuator valve 680 associated with adownforce actuator 280 on (e.g., mounted to) the wing section 310associated with the wing flex actuator 312. In other embodiments step810 is accomplished by obtaining a signal from a pressure sensor orforce sensor configured to measure pressure or force, respectively,acting on each actuator 280 associated with the wing section 310. Atstep 815, the monitor 610 preferably determines a sum M_(R) of themoments applied by the actuators 280 to the wing section 310, e.g.,using the relation:

M_(R)=ΣD_(N)k_(N)P_(R,N)

-   -   Where: D_(N)=Horizontal distance from wing section flex joint        and actuator 280 of Nth row unit;        -   P_(R,N)=Pressure in actuator 280 of the Nth row unit; and        -   k_(N)=Empirical ratio between vertical force applied by            actuator 280 and P_(R).

At step 820, the monitor 610 preferably determines the moment M_(A)applied by the wing flex actuator 312 to the wing section 310, e.g.,using the relation:

M_(A)=k_(A)P_(A)

-   -   Where: P_(A)=Pressure in actuator 312; and        -   k_(A)=Empirical ratio between moment applied by actuator 312            and P_(A).

At step 825 the monitor 610 preferably estimates the vertical groundsurface load F_(W) acting on the wing wheel 550, e.g., using therelation:

$F_{W} = \frac{{( W_{W} )( D_{C} )} + M_{A} - M_{R}}{D_{W}}$

-   -   Where: D_(W)=Horizontal distance between wing flex joint and        wing wheel soil contact location;        -   W_(w)=Weight of the wing section (including the toolbar            section itself and any loads carried thereby, e.g., liquid            tanks); and        -   D_(C)=Horizontal distance between wing flex joint and center            of gravity of wing section.

At step 830, the monitor 610 preferably compares the estimated wingwheel load F_(W) to a desired wing wheel load F_(W,D). In someembodiments, the desired wing wheel load may be a constant preselectedvalue, which may be preloaded in the memory of the monitor 610. In otherembodiments, the desired wing wheel load may be a fraction of the totalload (measured or estimated) on the center wheels 450, 460. In someembodiments, the desired wing wheel load may be determined according tothe methods described in the '287 Application, previously incorporatedby reference.

At step 835, the monitor 610 preferably modifies the control pressure ofone or both of the wing flex valves 612 in order to bring the estimatedwing wheel load F_(W) closer to the desired wing wheel load F_(D). Forexample, if the wing flex valve 612 associated with the lift chamber ofthe wing flex actuator 312 is commanding a first lift pressure and F_(W)is less than F_(D), then the wing flex valve 612 preferably decreasesthe control pressure supplied to the wing flex valve 312 associated withthe lift chamber. The amount of modification to the control pressure ofthe wing flex valve 612 is preferably determined using PID controlalgorithms as are known in the art.

It should be appreciated that the performance of process 800 is notdependent on the wing wheel load estimates being the same as the actualload on the wing wheels. Rather, if another value is calculated that isdirectly or indirectly related to the wing wheel load, such value may belikewise used to carry out the process 800.

The monitor 610 is preferably configured to perform a wing flex weighttransfer process 1200 illustrated in FIG. 12. The process 1200 generallycontrols the pressure in one or more of the actuators 312, 345 based inpart on the downforce applied by downforce actuators 312, 345, 280 tothe toolbar center section 330. At step 1205 the operator preferablydraws the planter 300 across a field in the working configurationillustrated in FIG. 3. At step 1210, the monitor 610 preferablydetermines the downforce F_(R) applied at each row unit 200. In apreferred embodiment, step 1210 is accomplished by determining the netpressure P_(R) being commanded by the monitor 610 to each row unitdownforce valve 680 associated with an actuator 280 on (e.g., mountedto) the center section 330 and multiplying each value of P_(R) by anempirical ratio between P_(R) and F_(R). In other embodiments step 1210is accomplished by obtaining a signal from a pressure sensor or forcesensor configured to measure pressure or force, respectively, acting oneach actuator 280 associated with the center section 330. At steps 1215and 1220, the monitor 610 preferably determines the vertical forcesF_(W1), F_(W2) applied to the center section 330 by the wing flexactuators 312-1, 312-2, respectively, e.g., by multiplying the netpressure in each wing flex actuator by an empirical ratio between netpressure in each wing flex actuator and the resulting vertical forceapplied to the center section. At step 1225, the monitor 610 preferablydetermines the vertical force F_(H) applied to the center section 330 bythe hitch actuators 345, e.g., by multiplying the net pressure in thehitch actuator by an empirical ratio between net pressure in the hitchactuator and the resulting vertical force applied to the center section.

At step 1235, the monitor 610 preferably estimates the total load F_(C)on the center wheels 450, 460, e.g., using the relation:

F _(C) =W−F _(H) −ΣF _(R) −F _(W1) −F _(W2)

-   -   Where: W is an estimate of the weight of the center section 330.

In some embodiments the value of W is a constant value stored in memory.However, it should be appreciated that in many implements, the centersection supports one or more crop input containers such as seed hoppersor bulk tanks which change in weight as the crop input is applied in thefield. Thus in a preferred embodiment the value of W is determined byadding a center section weight with an empty crop input container (e.g.,bulk seed hopper) to the weight of seed in the container determinedusing a sensor or combination of sensors used to weigh the container. Insome embodiments the sensor comprises an array of load cells or scalesas disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/855,173 (pub. no.2012/003691), incorporated herein by reference. Similar systems andmethods may be used to determine a “live” weight of the wing sectionW_(W) in process 800.

At step 1240, the monitor 610 preferably compares the estimated totalload F_(C) on the center wheels to a desired total center wheel loadF_(C,D). In some embodiments, the desired total center wheel load may bea constant preselected value, which may be preloaded in the memory ofthe monitor 610. In other embodiments, the desired wing wheel load maybe a fraction of a load (measured or estimated) on the wheels or asubset of the wheels (e.g., the rear wheels) of the tractor drawing theplanter 300. In some embodiments, the desired center wheel load andrecommended modifications to the actuator pressures may be determinedaccording to the methods described in the '287 Application, previouslyincorporated by reference.

At step 1235, the monitor 610 preferably modifies the control pressureof one or more of the valves 612, 645 in order to bring the estimatedcenter wheel load F_(C) closer to the desired wing wheel load F_(C,D).In some embodiments, if the wing flex valves 612-1, 612-2 associatedwith the lift chamber of the wing flex actuators 312 are commandingfirst and second lift pressures and F_(C) is less than F_(C,D), then thewing flex valves 612-1, 612-2 preferably decreases the control pressuresupplied to lift chambers of the wing flex actuators 312. In otherembodiments, if the hitch valves 645 are commanding a net lift pressureand F_(C) is less than F_(C,D), then one of the hitch valves 645preferably decreases the control pressure supplied to the to the liftchamber of the hitch actuator 345. In still other embodiments anoperating state of both the hitch valves 645 and wing flex valves 612 ismodified in order to bring F_(C) closer to F_(C,D); for example, ifF_(C) is greater than F_(C,D) then both wing flex lift pressures and thehitch lift pressure are preferably reduced. The amount of modificationto the control pressure of the valves 612, 645 is preferably determinedusing PID control algorithms as are known in the art.

It should be appreciated that the performance of process 1200 is notdependent on the center wheel load estimates being the same as theactual load on the center wheels. Rather, if another value is calculatedthat is directly or indirectly related to the center wheel load, suchvalue may be likewise used to carry out the process 1200.

In some embodiments of the processes 800 and 1200 described above, thedownforce applied at each row unit is determined using the pressurecommanded to the row unit downforce actuators 280. However, in someembodiments of the planter 300 another downforce apparatus such as anadjustable spring is used in place of each row unit downforce actuator280; in such embodiments the monitor 610 is preferably configured tocalculate a row unit downforce based on a setting indicator preferablyentered by the user and stored in memory of the monitor. For example,turning to FIG. 13, in embodiments using an adjustable spring havingmultiple settings (i.e., multiple notches in which the spring isextended to various tensions as is known in the art), the monitor 610preferably displays a screen 1300 allowing the user to enter the springsetting into a field 1310 associated with each row unit 200. In carryingout the processes 800, 1200, the monitor 610 preferably determinesdownforce on each row unit using an empirical ratio stored in memorywhich relates the row unit spring setting entered in screen 1300 to anestimated downforce on the row unit.

The monitor 610 is preferably configured to shut off one or more of theweight transfer actuators 312, 345 in response to a signal received fromone or both of the wing position sensors 620. One such process 900 isillustrated in FIG. 9. At step 905, the operator preferably draws theplanter 300 across the field in the working configuration illustrated inFIG. 3. The monitor 610 preferably determines (e.g., based on userinput) that the planter is in a working configuration such that theremainder of the process 900 is carried out. At step 907, the monitor610 preferably commands pressures to the left wing flex valve 612-1 andthe left wing flex valve 612-2. At step 910, the monitor 610 monitorsthe signal generated by the left wing position sensor 620-1. At step915, the monitor 610 monitors the signal generated by the right wingposition sensor 620-2. At step 920, the monitor 610 compares the leftwing position sensor signal to the “wing lowered” value. In eachcomparison of a position sensor signal described herein, the “lowered”value may comprise a signal level corresponding to a “lowered” positionor a threshold value distinguishable from the “lowered” value, e.g.,110% of the signal level corresponding to the “lowered” position. Atstep 925, the monitor 610 compares the right wing position sensor signalto the “wing lowered” value. At step 930, the monitor 610 identifies a“wing raised” condition based on one of the left or right positionsensor signals exceeding the “wing lowered” value.

In response to the identification of the “wing raised” condition at step930, at step 935 the monitor 610 preferably reduces the pressuresupplied to the lift chamber of the actuator 312 (of the wing section310 in the “wing raised” condition) by reducing the control pressurecommanded to the wing flex valve 612 in fluid communication with thelift chamber. The “lift” chamber, as used herein, refers to the chamberin the wing flex actuator whose increased pressure causes raising of thewing wheel or decreased downpressure on the associated wing wheel. Atstep 940, the monitor 610 preferably waits a predetermined time (e.g., 3seconds) and again compares the “wing lowered” value to the signal fromthe wing position sensor 620 that previously generated a signalcorresponding to a “wing raised” condition. If step 940 results in a“wing raised” condition being again identified at step 950, then at step955 the monitor preferably places both wing flex valves 612 associatedwith the wing flex actuator 312 (of the wing section 310 in the “wingraised” condition) in a “float mode”, i.e., commands an equal (e.g.,zero or negligible) pressure to both of the wing flex valves. In someembodiments, at step 955 the monitor also places the hitch valve 645 ina float mode. At step 960, the monitor 610 preferably waits apredetermined time (e.g., 3 seconds) and again compares the “winglowered” value to the signal from the wing position sensor 620 thatpreviously generated a signal corresponding to a “wing raised”condition. If step 960 results in a “wing raised” condition being againidentified at step 965, then at step 970 the monitor preferably closesthe shut-off valve 690 in order to stop pressurized fluid flow to thewing flex valves 612 (and in some embodiments to the hitch valves 645).

The monitor 610 is preferably configured to shut off one or more of theweight transfer actuators 312, 345 in response to a signal received fromone or both of the center wheel position sensors 630. One such process1100 is illustrated in FIG. 11. At step 1105, the operator preferablydraws the planter 300 across the field in the working configurationillustrated in FIG. 3. The monitor 610 preferably determines (e.g.,based on user input) that the planter is in a working configuration suchthat the remainder of the process 1100 is carried out. At step 1107, themonitor 610 preferably commands pressures to the left wing flex valve612-1 and the left wing flex valve 612-2. At step 1110, the monitor 610monitors the signal generated by the left center wheel position sensor630-1. At step 1115, the monitor 610 monitors the signal generated bythe right center wheel position sensor 630-2. At step 1120, the monitor610 compares the left center wheel position sensor signal to the “centerlowered” value. At step 1125, the monitor 610 compares the right centerwheel position sensor signal to the “center lowered” value. At step1130, the monitor 610 identifies a “center raised” condition based onone of the left or right position sensor signals exceeding the “centerlowered” value.

In response to the identification of the “center raised” condition atstep 1130, at step 1135 the monitor 610 preferably reduces the pressuresupplied to the downpressure chamber of the actuators 312-1, 312-2 (orin some embodiments only the actuator 312 adjacent to the center wheelin the “center raised” condition) by reducing the control pressurecommanded to the wing flex valve 612 in fluid communication with thedownpressure chamber. The “downpressure” chamber, as used herein, refersto the chamber in the wing flex actuator whose increased pressure causeslowering of the associated wing wheel or increased downpressure on theassociated wing wheel. At step 1140, the monitor 610 preferably waits apredetermined time (e.g., 3 seconds) and again compares the “centerlowered” value to the signal from the center wheel position sensor 630that previously generated a signal corresponding to a “center raised”condition. If step 1140 results in a “center raised” condition beingagain identified at step 1150, then at step 1155 the monitor 610preferably places both wing flex valves 612 associated with both wingflex actuators 312 in a “float mode”, i.e., commands an equal (e.g.,zero or negligible) pressure to both of the wing flex valves. In someembodiments, at step 1155 the monitor also places the hitch valves 645in a float mode. At step 1160, the monitor 610 preferably waits apredetermined time (e.g., 3 seconds) and again compares the “centerlowered” value to the signal from the center wheel position sensor 630that previously generated a signal corresponding to a “center raised”condition. If step 1160 results in a “center raised” condition beingagain identified at step 1165, then at step 1170 the monitor preferablycloses the shut-off valve 690 in order to stop pressurized fluid flow tothe wing flex valves 612 (and in some embodiments to the hitch valves645).

The monitor 610 is preferably configured to perform a calibrationprocess 1400 prior to field operations for determining a maximumactuator pressure based on a position sensor value. At step 1405, themonitor 610 preferably gradually increases the pressure commanded to thewing flex valve 612 in fluid communication with the lift chamber of oneof the wing flex actuators 312. At step 1410, the monitor 610 receives asignal corresponding to a “wing raised” condition from the wing positionsensor 620 associated with the same wing as the actuator of step 1405.At step 1415, the monitor 610 preferably determines a maximum wing liftcommand (i.e., the maximum desired command to the wing flex valve ofstep 1405) based on the pressure commanded to the valve at the time the“wing raised” signal was received. The maximum command may be the sameas or a threshold percentage (e.g., 90%) of the command corresponding tothe “wing raised” signal. It should be appreciated that steps 1405,1410, 1415 should be repeated for the wing position sensor and wingactuator associated with the other wing section.

At step 1420, the monitor 610 preferably gradually increases thepressure commanded to the wing flex valve 612 in fluid communicationwith the downpressure chamber of one of the wing flex actuators 312. Atstep 1425, the monitor 610 receives a signal corresponding to a “centerraised” condition from the center wheel position sensor 630 on the sameside of the planter as the actuator of step 1420. At step 1435, themonitor 610 preferably determines a maximum wing downpressure command(i.e., the maximum desired command to the wing flex valve of step 1420)based on the pressure commanded to the valve at the time the “centerraised” signal was received. The maximum command may be the same as or athreshold percentage (e.g., 90%) of the command corresponding to the“center raised” signal. It should be appreciated that steps 1420, 1425,1435 should be repeated for the wing actuator on the other wing sectionand the center wheel actuator on the same side of the planter as theother wing section. In another embodiment, both wing downpressurecommands (i.e., the commands to both downpressure wing flex valves 312)are increased (preferably simultaneously, and preferably such that thesame pressure is commanded to both valves) until a “center raised”signal is generated by either of the center wheel position sensors620-1, 620-2 and the maximum downpressure command is determined based onthe downpressure command to the wing flex valves (or one of the valves)at the time of the “center raised” signal.

During a field operation (e.g., planting), at step 1440 the monitor 610preferably replaces any wing lift pressure commands determined byanother process (e.g., the weight transfer processes described herein)and exceeding the maximum pressure determined at step 1420 with themaximum pressure determined at step 1420. At step 1445 the monitor 610preferably replaces any wing downpressure commands determined by anotherprocess (e.g., the weight transfer processes described herein) andexceeding the maximum pressure determined at step 1435 with the maximumpressure determined at step 1435.

In a preferred embodiment, the monitor 610 is configured to perform eachof the calibration and weight transfer and calibration processesdescribed herein. In such an embodiment, the monitor 610 carries out theprocesses 800 and/or 1200 but overrides excessive pressure commandsaccording to the process 1400; moreover, the processes 900 and 1100 arepreferably carried out in the case that a “center raised” or “wingraised” condition is identified.

As used herein, “data communication” may refer to any of electricalcommunication, electronic communication, wireless (e.g., radio,microwave, infrared, sonic, near field, etc.) communication, orcommunication by any other medium configured to transmit analog signalsor digital data.

The foregoing description is presented to enable one of ordinary skillin the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the contextof a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications tothe preferred embodiment of the apparatus, and the general principlesand features of the system and methods described herein will be readilyapparent to those of skill in the art. Thus, the present invention isnot to be limited to the embodiments of the apparatus, system andmethods described above and illustrated in the drawing figures, but isto be accorded the widest scope consistent with the spirit and scope ofthe appended claims.

1. A weight transfer control system for an agricultural implement, theagricultural implement having a wing section, said wing section having awing wheel disposed to rollingly support said wing section, the weighttransfer control system comprising: a wing flex actuator configured tomodify downforce applied to said wing section of the implement; a wingflex valve in fluid communication with said wing flex actuator; a wingposition sensor; processing circuitry in data communication with saidwing position sensor, said processing circuitry configured to determinea position of said wing section; and a shut-off valve, said shut-offvalve configured to selectively cut off fluid flow to said wing flexvalve.
 2. The weight transfer control system of claim 1, wherein saidwing position sensor comprises: an electromagnetic field generator; andan electromagnetic field detector, wherein a distance between saidelectromagnetic field detector and said electromagnetic field generatorchanges when said wing section is raised.
 3. The weight transfer controlsystem of claim 2, wherein said distance reaches a maximum distance whensaid wing section is in a raised position.
 4. The weight transfercontrol system of claim 3, further comprising: a wing wheel actuatorconfigured to raise and lower said wing wheel; a pin mounted to one ofsaid wing section and said wing wheel actuator; a slot formed in one ofsaid wing section and said wing wheel actuator; and wherein said maximumdistance is reached when said pin contacts a limiting edge of said slot.5. The weight transfer control system of claim 2, wherein saidelectromagnetic field generator comprises a magnet, and wherein saidelectromagnetic field detector comprises a Hall effect sensor.
 6. Theweight transfer control system of claim 1, further including: a row unitpivotally mounted to said wing section; a row unit downforce actuatordisposed to modify a downforce applied to said row unit; and a row unitdownforce control valve, said row unit downforce control valve in fluidcommunication with said row unit downforce actuator.
 7. The weighttransfer control system of claim 6, further including: a center wheellift actuator; and a center wheel position sensor.
 8. The weighttransfer control system of claim 1, further including: a center wheellift actuator; and a center wheel position sensor.
 9. The weighttransfer control system of claim 1, further including: a hitch actuatorconfigured to shift weight between the implement and a tractor drawingthe implement; and a hitch valve, said hitch valve configured to selecta pressure in said hitch actuator.